Recently, I watched a review of The Creator, a science fiction movie directed and co-written by Gareth Edwards (the director of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story [2016]), having heard someone mention this film awhile back. The reviewer explained that the movie was an original story and then defined what he meant by original. (A story that is not connected to an existing intellectual property, i.e., like Star Wars or Star Trek). In a day when 99% of movies are based on existing properties, he rejoiced that here was an original story. However, he wondered if audiences, who often clamored for “original” content, would actually see the movie he deemed worth seeing.
This is not a post for or against the movie, since I haven’t seen it. But the discussion of whether audiences would support original content got me thinking about what people (including myself) actually want and also, what exactly is original. Many cynically quote the phrase “nothing new under the sun,” which is actually part of a Bible verse: Ecclesiastes 1:9 “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” I’m not sure whether or not the phrase is quoted to pre-dismiss content deemed original. Sometimes maybe? Particularly when an author produces a book in a genre category some have decided is overcrowded. Vampires (“nothing new under the sun”). Zombies (“nothing new under the sun”). Totalitarian governmental systems/dystopia (“nothing new under the sun”). Schools of magic (“nothing new under the sun”).
Yet there is something about these categories that attracts readers/viewers regardless of what others proclaim on social media.
But I have to confess to being a little bit gun-shy at times when I see a story touted as “original.” Fear of the unknown, perhaps. Or fear of being burned again, having tried books deemed as such only to dislike them.
I’m dating myself but I remember when the first Star Wars movie launched. I didn’t know much about it before going to see it. But there was something so attractive about it, I had to see it. Its creator/director/writer, George Lucas, has mentioned Flash Gordon movies from the 1930s and Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a Thousand Faces as his inspirations to create original content.
Granted, I was preconditioned to like science fiction stories, since I grew up reading and watching stories of this genre. I’m grateful to have lived in an era of great stories of the imagination.
In order for me to engage in original content, something about it has to appeal to my imagination and heart. Hero’s journey stories usually have me at “hello.” 😊 I love stories where a hero (male or female) ventures into unknown territory and comes out changed.
And I know. Some say hero’s journey stories have “been done,” while rolling their eyes. Yet a journey story can be as original as the journey story of someone in real life. Interesting how no one discounts the “originality” of real-life stories even when those stories share similar content as other stories (birth, high school graduation, true love, etc.). “You graduated from college? That’s been done before.” Says no one ever.
Will I see The Creator? 🤷🏽 I might. It takes guts for someone to produce an original work these days.
What’s your take on original stories? Like them? Dislike them? Feel free to comment below.
The Creator movie poster and Rogue One: A Star Wars movie poster found somewhere online. Book cover from Goodreads